From IEEE
MultiMedia volume 22, I choose the paper “A Survey of Current YouTube Video
Characteristics” published by Xianhui Che in 2015. The paper studies YouTube
videos to better
understand their characteristics and to demonstrate consistency with previous
research. In addition to this, the paper also presents new categories of features emerging.
Due to Google's acquisition of YouTube in 2007, there has been some changes in user
policy and service infrastructure. The choosen paper has an impact factor of 1.694.
Which quantitative method or methods are used in
the paper? Which are the benefits and limitations of using these methods?
The paper depicts the
latest YouTube traffic profiles and delivers updated and valuable information
for future researchers with a customized Web spider which crawled over more than one million Videos.
Crawling has been a popular methodology for collecting and characterizing
YouTube videos. The authors compare different statistics with their own
findings since these measurements present similar scopes of investigation, covering
video categories and duration as well as file sizes.
What
did you learn about quantitative methods from reading the paper?
Since this paper
uses a different way to achieve quantity data using a web spider, I did not
learn something about quantitative methods in general. The paper describes how
the web spider works and what it did to collect metadata information from YouTube video content. Nevertheless, this “new” way of
collecting data is interesting to me since it fits more to this research field
than e. g. a questionnaire.
Which
are the main methodological problems of the study? How could the use of the
quantitative method or methods have been improved?
Regarding the used
method and the amount of collected data, I do not see a main methodological
problems of the study. This paper can benefit telecommunication providers in the evaluation and
estimation of cache usage in network services. Furthermore, methodological
approach in form of a web spider can also be used to analyze similar levels of
mass provision within digital media service. The only problem of the study might
be the copyright and access issue which were justified by the authors.
One of the
keywords in the text “Drumming in Immersive Virtual Reality: The Body Shapes he
Way We Play” written by Konstantina Kilteni, Ilias Bergstrom, and Mel Slater is
“Immersive Virtual Reality”.
This term refers to transporting people to a
virtual place where they experience events and take part in activities. This
study focusses on the hypothesis if e.g. different skin colours have an impact
on the person’s behaviour in the virtual reality. In this virtual reality, the
users play African drums and see, instead of their own hands, the hands of a
Caucasian formally dressed male or a dark-skinned casually dressed male. The
study shows that using an avatar could indeed have influence on the behaviour.
Which
are the benefits and limitations of using quantitative methods?
Quantitative methods
describe the behaviour in the form of models, contexts and numerical expressions
as accurately as possible. It will generally consist of a survey or observation
of a possible large and representative random sample using methods such as a
written survey questionnaires or a quantitative interview. These measured
values are compared and put in relation to each other or with other variables.
Afterwards the results then will be generalized to the population. Often a
predetermined hypothesis is checked based on the data. The information gained
is in quantitative methods in data reduction. In order to ensure equal
conditions for the emergence of the measurements in a study, quantitative methods are usually
fully standardized and structured, e.g. each respondent receives exactly
the same conditions in answering the questions to make the statements of
respondents comparable with each other. One limitation of using quantitative methods
is that the cause of a
finding or an attitude such as dissatisfaction is not determined.
Which
are the benefits and limitations of using qualitative methods?
Compared to
quantitative methods, the qualitative methods are characterized by much greater
openness and flexibility. In the qualitative observation such as e. g.
shadowing, there is just the subjectivity of the observed and the observer
interesting. By doing so, a
high content validity and a deeper information content of the results is
achieved, without being able to make, however, representative and numerical
statements. Qualitative methods are applied exploratory and hypothesis-that
theorizing is gradual and will be further developed during the investigation.
The aim of qualitative research is to map the reality based on the subjective
view of the relevant conversation. A limitation of using qualitative methods is
that they are relatively
time consuming and costly. The requirements for the qualification of the
interviewer / observer are quite high, the quality of data is to some extent
also dependent on it. The evaluation is relatively expensive, especially when
compared to the quantitative methods. Furthermore for qualitative data, you cannot
derive any numerical quantities.
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen