Posts mit dem Label Theme 3 werden angezeigt. Alle Posts anzeigen
Posts mit dem Label Theme 3 werden angezeigt. Alle Posts anzeigen
Dienstag, 29. September 2015
Sonntag, 27. September 2015
Theme 3: Research and theory // Reflection
As an introduction to the lecture, we figured out that
a common use of the word theory implies that something is unproven or speculative
which is better characterized by the word hypothesis. A theory is a set of proposition that aims to
identify objects and their relation to each other. Furthermore, a theory is an
abstract entity that aims to describe, explain and enhance understanding of the
world and in some cases to provide predictions of what will happen in the
future and to give a basis for intervention and action. Theory is something we
construct it does not exist by itself. Knowing is about seeing. Theory is about
the connections between phenomena, and explaining WHY, HOW and under WHAT
circumstances acts, events, structures, and thoughts occur. Scientific theories
attempt to explain the causal logic between cause and event. This is why theory
ca be contrasted with praxis or practice. However, it is important to note that
this distinction can be put in question, as theory is a form of practice and
practice also always has a theoretical dimension. Due to these findings, you
can say that truth is related to the state of knowledge right now. Truth is
relative.
Furthermore,
we discussed the question “What is men?” during the lecture. In our group, we
brainstormed the following keywords: Technology; Cognition/mind; Very developed
species; Feelings; Curiosity; Language; Culture; Social interaction/empathy; structured
time/space. In class, we came to the following findings: A combination of the
human bodies and consciousness; High developed species; Create and think; Homo faber; High requirement of spiritual
energy; Morality; Right/wrong; Know how to lie; Feigning; Living towards death;
Egalitarian; Sexual. Furthermore, we mentioned Post-humanism, which is
basically our keyword technology.
In
the seminar, we discussed in small groups different aspects of the lecture and
started with the different theory types Analysis, Explanation, Prediction,
Explanation and Prediction (EP), and Design and Action mentioned in the paper.
Furthermore, we tried to explain theory in our own words and came up with a differentiation
of theory and hypothesis. To us, theory is an attempt to explain the causal
logic between cause and event. But there is a difference between scientific and
philosophical theory. We figured out that hypothesis is a statement or guess
for research purpose which tries to explain two variables. In addition to this,
we discussed that you can find truth for a hypothesis through falsification. In
class, we stated that theory is what is practice not. In addition to this, we
mentioned Thomas S. Kuhn, who “was an American physicist, historian, and
philosopher of science whose controversial book ‘The Structure of Scientific
Revolutions’ was influential in both academic and popular circles, introducing
the term ‘paradigm shift’, which has since become an English-language idiom.”* A
paradigm shift is a phrase to describe a change or "revolution" in
the basic concepts of a scientific discipline.
All
in all, I have understood the term theory better after the seminar since it was
easier to get because of the simplified explanation even though my approach
before the lecture was on the right track. Nevertheless, I would have find it
useful if we would have discussed the chosen papers and focused a bit more on
the questions since I am still not sure if I have classified my paper correctly
regarding the characterization of theory types. Indeed, we discussed the
different types briefly and tried to find an answer by comparing our papers
with each other but we were still not sure if we were right.
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Kuhn
Donnerstag, 17. September 2015
Theme 3: Research and theory
I
believe that the journal IEEE MultiMedia is important for media technology
research since its technical information covers a broad range of issues in
multimedia systems and applications and provides a forum for researchers and
practitioners to present new findings and discuss experiences with multimedia
systems and applications. The journal’s subjects are Communication, Networking
& Broadcasting as well as Computing & Processing. It has an impact
factor of 1,694.
From
IEEE MultiMedia volume 22, I choose the article “Social Media, Democracy, and Democratization”
published by Daniel Gayo-Avello in 2015. The paper is about the confluence of
social media with political action. Since Gayo-Avello calls it “a complex field
raising important questions”, the paper addresses the blending of social media
and politics. First, Gayo-Avello states that not all social media users are
similar. He differentiates between media elites, such as politicians and
journalists, and non-elite users, such as common citizens. To support his
theory, Gayo-Avello states why political discussions in social media are not
always rational due to e.g. the generally lack of strong arguments and
coherency. Therefore, the article “Social Media, Democracy, and
Democratization” states that promises of social media to boost political engagement
and democracy are still unfulfilled. Accoring to Gayo-Avello, social media is
the product of communicative capitalism, and the goal is not to boost political
action. He suggests to continually work on information provenance in social
media and credibility assessment.
Briefly explain to
a first year university student what theory is, and what theory is not.
A
theory is an abstract scientific model or concept that tries to explain a part
of reality. Furthermore, a theory could be a way of thinking, that tries to
solve problems without inclusion of practice.
Describe the major
theory or theories that are used in your selected paper. Which theory type (see
Table 2 in Gregor) can the theory or theories be characterized as?
In
the paper “The Nature of Theory in Information Systems”, Gregor describes five
different theory types: Analysis, Explanation, Prediction, Explanation and
Prediction (EP), and Design and Action. In Gayo-Avello’s “Social Media,
Democracy, and Democratization”, he describes what the problem is and how, why
and when it occurred. At the end, Gayo-Avello suggests on how to improve the
prospects of political action in social media. According to the table it would
probably be the number five “Design and Action”.
Which are the
benefits and limitations of using the selected theory or theories?
A
benefit of the theory “Design and Action” is that it “Says how to do something”. The
theory gives explicit prescriptions. The limitation of the theory on the other
hand is that it lacks scientific data which mean that the theory can’t apply on
every similar case and make a generalization.
Abonnieren
Posts (Atom)